RESUMO
Background The present study aimed to address the importance of a new radiological sign - the presence of fecal loading at the caecum - for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi from January 2020 to June 2020. Patients who presented in the emergency with acute pain at the right iliac fossa fulfilling the criteria of acute appendicitis (AA) according to the Alvarado scoring system, and were planned for appendectomy were included. Before surgery plain abdominal radiographs were taken in anteroposterior view in the supine position and were evaluated for the presence of fecal loading at the caecum. After that all patients underwent surgery and radiologic findings were correlated with histopathologic findings. Results The mean age of patients was 32.19±7.34 years. There were 83 (55.3%) male and 67 (44.7%) female patients. Out of 150, there were 144 (96.0%) patients in whom fecal loading in the caecum was diagnosed on plain radiographs. On histopathology reporting, acute appendicitis was diagnosed in 143 (95.3%) patients. Regarding accuracy, fecal loading at the caecum was found to have a sensitivity of 98.6%, specificity of 83.3%, a positive predictive value of 99.3%, and a negative predictive value of 71.4%. Conclusion According to the results of the present study and existing literature, we suggest using fecal loading at the caecum along with a clinical scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. As per our findings, fecal loading at the caecum is a valuable sign on plain abdominal radiograph for the diagnosis of AA. It has a sensitivity of 98.6% and a specificity of 83.3%. This sign typically becomes undetectable after an appendectomy. It will help to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of acute appendicitis, and hence will reduce the chances of negative appendectomy.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship of Neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) values with the benign and malignant thyroid nodules. METHODS: In this cross-sectional clinical study conducted from September 1st 2020 to February 28th 2021, we included 216 patients who underwent thyroidectomy at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi Pakistan. After thyroidectomy specimens were sent for pathologic examination. Patients were divided into two categories based on histopathologic results; Malignant nodule and benign nodules. Data of complete blood count was obtained from the pre-operative lab investigations and NLR was calculated. RESULTS: There were 42 (26%) men, and 116 (74%) women of 158 in the BTN group, 18 (31%) men, and 40 (69%) women of 58 in the MTN group. The mean age of 48 ± 6 years in the BTN group as well as 47 ±8 years in the MTN group (p-value 0.32). The mean neutrophil count in the BTN group was 4.26 ± 2.8 versus 4.41 ± 2.2 (x 1000/mm3)) the malignance thyroid group (p-value = 0.71). The mean lymphocyte count was 3.81 ± 0.9(x 1000/mm3) in the BTN group and 3.61± 1.2 (x 1000/mm3) in the malignance group (p-value = 0.18). The mean NLR value for the benign thyroid nodular group was 1.19 ± 2.2 and 1.22±1.8 in the malignant thyroid nodular group (p-value = 0.92). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, we concluded that preoperative period biochemistry laboratory results such as neutrophils count, lymphocyte count, and NLR value don't provide enough evidence to differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid carcinoma.
